00:00
00:00
Fro

231 Art Reviews

147 w/ Responses

2 reviews are hidden due to your filters.

I see in one of your responses that you didn't use a scanner. Like mentioned in my last review I highly recommend focusing on the lighting when taking a picture of this for the future. It's really hard to see this one, but you can tell that it was really good with or without the blur.

Let me know when you submit something else so I can check it out.

NekoMika responds:

Thankies and can do

This is a neat drawing. I think it looks good, but what was the method of getting it onto the computer? It kind of looks like you maybe took a picture with a cellphone or other type of camera and then saved it onto your computer? Maybe scanning it on would have resulted in less of a blur or maybe even just turning the lights up to get better clarity on it.

NekoMika responds:

I took a pic with a phone, I was kind of a dunce at the time, sadly no longer have the drawing anywhere.

This is a really cool piece. I checked out what they look like on google and really think they should take some tips from you! I think this piece would have really looked better if it was placed with some kind of background. Perhaps something from the game or even something as simple as a dark green grass with some shadow work to place him in the middle of the woods.

Overall a very good illustration.

It's a neat piece, but it really has a weird perspective... or is that just me?

It seems that the person is just standing there with no regards to the fact that his legs are cut off. Perhaps that was done on purpose and I just can't tell. The lighting/shading effect is alright, but it would have been a lot better if the piece had better detail in the background. Maybe the dark outline of objects in the background.. a cabin... trees... mountains... etc... Really anything.. It kind of has an incomplete feeling without that stuff there.

Why isn't he wearing shoes? Ha, he's fully and normally dressed other than that.

This is really cool stuff! All of the guys with the sharp teeth focused in the top left and middle are by far my favorite. Being done on lined paper gives it a really awesome comic look and is really fitting for this sketch piece.

The two headed guy is a cool concept. I'm kind of interested in his background and story. I think the defensive units in the top right were kind of lacking in detail and not as well done as the other ones.

Tiny-Airman responds:

o-oh goodness, it's an actual art review... thanks a lot, man!

★ - this was done on a lined piece of paper in the first place because i didn't have copy paper at the time, i thought that it was usually a bad thing to do serious drawings on lined paper... ( ^ ^ )
★ - i didn't really think about giving the test experiments back stories since the main plot is about Maxwell's escape (the grunt on the top left), but the best i can say is that all of these test subjects were once normal grunts that got subdued and kidnapped to be horribly experimented on in an illegal, secretive laboratory. the last thing i remember with Larry & Jerry (the conjoined grunts) was that they were sawed in half and stitched back together to experiment with blood flow to keep the body alive... something along those lines. FOR SCIENCE!
★ - as for the defense units, i didn't really go into detail with their armor because i don't like making overly detailed characters since i'll just end up forgetting their own details and such. but it's not only for me, but also for others if they wanted to draw my fan characters. just kinda keep it simple and easy, you catch my drift? ( `o' ) ~★

It's pretty good all around. The one breast is larger than the other! Something a man like I always notices. It's not natural, or what my programmed mind wants breasts to naturally be, perfectly symmetrical haha.

I thought the line work around the throat, collarbones, and face could have used some work. For example, the nose is shaped a bit odd in my opinion. I also don't like that the color isn't completely filled in. The white spaces in between the red and pink colors sticks out like a sore thumb to me, almost drives me nuts.

The one earring was off enough to to catch my attention. I know I'm getting nick picky, but these are all things throwing my attention away from the main attraction of the picture. It may have been nice to have a slight color in the background to or even a background within itself.

All in all though it's pretty good, far better than I could draw and I agree it has that cool comic book feel to it. Keep on the good work.

Melons

An idea woman right? She cooks, she cleans, boobs, breasts, tits, jubblies, and honkers. Anyway, in a sexual way she's pretty good looking all around. Her face is nice, except for the nose. I feel like it's too piggy to do what you wanted it to do. You move down and find very subtle breasts and a very skinny midsection. She has what looks like very nice hips, but you can't be quite sure because she hides it behind a baggy dress. Hm, I know the focus was on her upper body, but why not have a tight skirt so we can see her figure better and even give us a little upper leg? That's what you were going for right? Plan old sex appeal?

On a more serious note... not saying what I was talking about above wasn't serious... but I love how you have the light hit her skin. The color was blended and mixed perfectly as well. The background was very fitting, but I rather her actually be in a background of a kitchen or house of sorts. I only say this because it feels out of place to put bright spots (where the light is hitting her skin), but not to have any shadows. With an actual background her shadow would be present, but there should also be more shadow on her body as well. (I know this sort of disagrees with other reviewers, but meh, that's why it's called an opinion I guess!)

An all in all very well drawn person. The body looks nothing like an actual human body, but you've represented what cartoons and media make women look like. Good color, drawing, and texture all in all. Keep up the good work.

Billosopher responds:

Boobs indeed. I'm glad you gave your opinion even if it doesn't fit with everyone else's! Her body is almost taken right from the source and I really wanted to play around with the female form in this. Thanks for the review!

I refuse to say cute for a couple of reasons.

I'm not calling a picture of a 15 year old boy cute even if it is just a piece of art and also because I don't really find it to be all that cute. I think the better word to use, and this is just my opinion, is dull.

I use the word dull not only to explain the lack of said cuteness, but also because I have no clue what the emotion is. Have you ever knew somebody who had a hard time showing their emotions? I do and on top of being a good person to make fun of it's also a tad annoying when I have no clue if he's happy, sad, angry, joking around, or serious. This picture follows that theme.

The look on his face could mean several things and not being able to put your finger on it can be a tad bit annoying to the person viewing it. Is the character trying to be cute in some way? I hope not because it's a terrible way to position your face if you were. Is he scared of something and he's yelling, is he yelling to a good friend, or is he that kid in the chorus who's nervous so he stands up very stiff and sings quieter than the others. (It looks like the last one so far)

He could also be really surprised or frozen in fear. I think frozen in fear would be the look to go with here. So let's build off of it and see what we can do with this picture. Let's bring up that word dull again and use it in a different way. Can I suggest using it as another word for empty? I always stress this in my reviews. Would you rather see a piece of art with a character with no content around him or a character with a background? I think if you asked that to a general population that the majority would pick having a background.

A background could have showed the emotion on his face. You could have had him in a Christmas theme and we would have known that he was surprised or excited. Put him in a dark environment with shadows or some ghoul and we automatically know that he's scared or frozen in fear.

I think I can envision this piece being in a bedroom with the only light source in the room coming from a small glow outside of a window and the rest emitting from a door that is half way open. The light shines into the room, but is covered by a mysterious and scary shadow, which drapes over a portion of the light like a blanket.

Onto the character itself, the shading could have been a tad bit better, but I actually really like it. A lot of people don't put the time or effort into proper shading and shadowing. Even though I jokingly poked at your character by calling him dull and bland I do find it to be well done. The reflection in the eyes was pretty cool, the proportions makes him look very cartoony, and it's just a neat little guy all around.

Overall it's a nice piece that could really be cool with some extra content and feeling put behind it. Simple things like I suggested can make a piece of "art" into a piece of art quite quickly. Keep on working in your spare time and I'll be interested in what you come up with.

~ Review Request Club ~

lgnxhll responds:

Thank you, ill keep working on putting a little more into my drawings.Thanks for the citisizem and complements.

I think it needs a lot of work.

It's definitely something that I would title as a sketch and not exactly something that I would want to showcase as my best work. I actually think it's a small level above the old Charlie Brown stuff that I made and it's probably only better because I tried to follow the art style as close as I could and yours has it's own personal touch. (Which is great, I love that you added your own personal touch to this piece, it's the best feature for sure)

All around I feel it's very sloppy, even for a sketch. I don't know if you needed to use pencil for the whole thing, but in my opinion it doesn't really look good. I would have loved to see cleaner thinner lines and shading with colored pencils instead of the normal gray pencil.

The window, the shadow, and the other places that you used a darker shade really don't look good at all. All in all the setting is rough at best and needs to be much neater before you have a good picture. The best thing would have to be the character in the middle even though the one side of his head looks like you messed up pretty bad.

So my overall opinion is that you need to take more time on this. Use thin and neat lines instead of the chicken scratch that you used on the majority of the picture and add some color and shade with the color instead of the black and gray. Those things should give the picture a better look.

~ Review Request Club ~

Blue-Dolphin responds:

Thanks bro, good to hear actual CONSTRUCTIVE criticism around Newgrounds for a change. But yes, it is a rough sketch, a REALLY rough sketch, I got the idea randomly in class to draw a beloved cartoon character huffing lines of snarsh, so I asked a girl in my class to name a famous cartoon character, and she said 'Garfield' I referred to a screenshot of a Garfield episode for the face features (The lines on the head and all that) but the image came out COMPLETELY different than the reference image itself.

But, the whole 'theme' I guess you'd call it isn't about the art quality, it's more of the story behind it, to show things like people you wouldn't even think twice of ever doing drugs, really do them, or how the government hides the fact that cocaine is widespread across the whole of North America, or whatever you as a person think it represents, I know it's not the most mature image, but it does have some effort in it, not artistically per se, but on a deeper level it can have the ability to turn heads and say "Woah, that's Garfield, and he's doing DRUGS!".

But altogether I spend maybe half an hour on the Garfield, and the table with a 6B pencil (All I had -.-) and I spent not even 5 minutes on the backround with a characoal stick.

But thanks again, Fro :)

A picture that I could have made fairly easily. :P

This looks like a picture that I could make fairly easy, but it doesn't mean that it's not a good picture. The art is good, but in my opinion it doesn't look like Tom really at all. I might not have seen him in real life, but I think the big thing that throws this picture off is the hair. (Which actually seems to disagree with the review behind me so whatever lol)

Also, it's pixel art right? Why take a copy/paste of the newgrounds tank on his shirt when you could have created one out of pixels to match the rest of the picture? Anyway, I like the character and it's something that I would like to see in a flash game for sure.

Speaking of that, why not put him in some sort of scenario? Make him slightly smaller and put a background behind him. I'm sure it wouldn't take too long to put him outside with some scenery or even put him in the office kicking ass like usual. Perhaps forcing Luis to do the dirty grunt work or something.

An all around good picture, but I just hate to see a character by itself. Add more content around the character to show us what he's really about!

~ Review Request Club ~

EventHorizon responds:

Thanks for the review, I honestly draw this piece of art was not difficult although I have drawn with the mouse, I used gold because the background was the same aura of the icons of the directors then gave them a touch of important this character will see very soon in my new game, but for now it's a secret.
thanks.

Dad, coach, fan of eating food.

Age 35, Male

Dad

New Of Grounds

Grounds of New

Joined on 4/12/04

Level:
54
Exp Points:
32,280 / 32,370
Exp Rank:
370
Vote Power:
9.51 votes
Audio Scouts
9
Art Scouts
10+
Rank:
Sup. Commander
Global Rank:
156
Blams:
13,010
Saves:
31,051
B/P Bonus:
60%
Whistle:
Deity
Trophies:
14
Medals:
12,423
Supporter:
5y 1m 3d
Gear:
8